Différences

Ci-dessous, les différences entre deux révisions de la page.

--- fichiers:pdf:des_caracteres_manquent_dans_mon_fichier_pdf [2018/05/22 11:36] – créée joseph.wright
+++ fichiers:pdf:des_caracteres_manquent_dans_mon_fichier_pdf [2018/12/04 00:21] (Version actuelle) – jejust
@@ Ligne 1: / Ligne 1: @@
-# Characters missing from PDF output
+====== Characters missing from PDF output ======
+If you're using //Acrobat Distiller// to create your
-If you're using `Acrobat` `Distiller` to create your
 PDF output, you may find
 characters missing.  This may manifest
 itself as messed-up maths equations (missing
-''-'' signs, for example), or bits missing
+"-" signs, for example), or bits missing
-from large symbols.  Early versions of `Distiller` used to
+from large symbols.  Early versions of ''Distiller'' used to
-ignore character positions 0&ndash;31 and 128&ndash;159 of every font: Adobe's
+ignore character positions 0--31 and 128--159 of every font: Adobe's
-fonts never use such positions, so why should `Distiller`?
+fonts never use such positions, so why should ''Distiller''?
+Well, the answer to this question is "because Adobe don't produce all
-Well, the answer to this question is ''because Adobe don't produce all
+the world's fonts" --- fonts like ''Computer''
-the world's fonts''&nbsp;&mdash; fonts like `Computer`
+''Modern'' were around before Adobe came on the scene, and
-`Modern` were around before Adobe came on the scene, and
+//they// use positions 0--31.  Adobe don't react to complaints like
-_they_ use positions 0&ndash;31.  Adobe don't react to complaints like
 that in the previous sentence, but they do release new versions of
-their programs; and `Distiller`, since at least version&nbsp;4.0,
+their programs; and ''Distiller'', since at least version 4.0,
-_has_ recognised the font positions it used to shun.
+//has// recognised the font positions it used to shun.
+Meanwhile, TeX users with old versions of ''Distiller'' need
-Meanwhile, TeX users with old versions of `Distiller` need
+to deal with their fonts.  ''Dvips'' comes to our aid: the
-to deal with their fonts.  `Dvips` comes to our aid: the
+switch ''-G1'' ("remap characters"), which moves the offending
-switch `-G1` (''remap characters''), which moves the offending
 characters out of the way.  The PDF configuration file
-(`-Ppdf`), recommended
+(''-Ppdf''), recommended
-in ''[the wrong type of fonts](./FAQ-fuzzy-type3.html)'',
+in "[[FAQ-fuzzy-type3|the wrong type of fonts]]",
 includes the switch.
 The switch is not without its problems; pre-2003 versions of
-`dvips` will apply it to Adobe fonts as well, causing
+''dvips'' will apply it to Adobe fonts as well, causing
-[havoc](./FAQ-charshift.html), but fortunately
+[[FAQ-charshift|havoc]], but fortunately
 that problem is usually soluble.  However, a document using both
 CM and Adobe-specified fonts is stuck.  The only real solution
-is either to upgrade `dvips`, or to spend money to upgrade
+is either to upgrade ''dvips'', or to spend money to upgrade
-`Distiller`.
+''Distiller''.
+-----
+//Source:// [[faquk>FAQ-distill-prob|Characters missing from PDF output]]
+{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(LaTeX,usage)
+metatag-og:title=(Characters missing from PDF output)
+metatag-og:site_name=(FAQ LaTeX francophone)
+}}