Différences

Ci-dessous, les différences entre deux révisions de la page.

--- fichiers:fontes:les_noms_de_fichiers_des_fontes [2018/06/03 13:11] – samcarter
+++ 5_fichiers:fontes:les_noms_de_fichiers_des_fontes [2021/06/06 17:24] (Version actuelle) – Correction des mots-clefs OpenGraph. Remise en forme. jejust
@@ Ligne 1: / Ligne 1: @@
----
+====== What is the “Berry naming scheme”? ======
-title: What is the "Berry naming scheme"?
-category: concepts
-permalink: /FAQ-fontname
-date: 2014-06-10
----
 In the olden days, (La)TeX distributions were limited by the
@@ Ligne 10: / Ligne 6: @@
 MS-DOS file system was a particular bugbear: fortunately any current
 Microsoft system allows rather more freedom to specify file names.
-Sadly, the ISO&nbsp;9660 standard for the structure of CD-ROMs has a
+Sadly, the ISO(nbsp)9660 standard for the structure of CD-ROMs has a
 similar failing, but that too has been modified by various extension
 mechanisms.)
 One area in which these short file names posed a particular problem
-was that of file names for Type&nbsp;1 fonts.
+was that of file names for Type(nbsp)1 fonts.
 These fonts are distributed by their vendors with
 pretty meaningless short names, and there's a natural ambition to
@@ Ligne 24: / Ligne 20: @@
 spiral out of control.  Font companies deal with the issue by
 inventing silly names, and providing a map file to show what the
-"real" names.  Thus the Monotype Corporation provides the
+"real" names.  Thus the Monotype Corporation provides the translations:
-translations:
-  `bas_____ BaskervilleMT`
-  `basb____ BaskervilleMT-Bold`
+<code>
+  bas_____ BaskervilleMT
-  `basbi___ BaskervilleMT-BoldItalic`
+  basb____ BaskervilleMT-Bold
+  basbi___ BaskervilleMT-BoldItalic
+</code>
 and so on.  These names could be used within (La)TeX programs,
 except that they are not unique: there's nothing to stop Adobe using
-`bas_____` for _their_ Baskerville font.
+''bas____'' for //their// Baskerville font.
 Thus arose the Berry naming scheme.
@@ Ligne 44: / Ligne 40: @@
 on), one to the weight, shape, and encoding and so on.
-The whole scheme is outlined in the [`fontname`](https://ctan.org/pkg/fontname) distribution,
+The whole scheme is outlined in the [[ctanpkg>fontname]] distribution,
 which includes extensive documentation and a set of tables of fonts
 whose names have been systematised.
+-----
+//Source:// [[faquk>FAQ-fontname|What is the “Berry naming scheme”?]]
+{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(LaTeX,concepts,fontes,polices de caractères,noms des fichiers)
+metatag-og:title=(What is the “Berry naming scheme”?)
+metatag-og:site_name=(FAQ LaTeX francophone)
+}}