Différences

Ci-dessous, les différences entre deux révisions de la page.

Lien vers cette vue comparative

Les deux révisions précédentesRévision précédente
Prochaine révision
Révision précédente
composition:pourquoi_n_est_ce_pas_wysiwyg4 [2018/05/28 12:08] d.p.carlislecomposition:pourquoi_n_est_ce_pas_wysiwyg4 [2020/12/26 19:50] (Version actuelle) – Suppression de la page, déplacée. yannick.tanguy
Ligne 1: Ligne 1:
---- 
-title: The TeX document preparation environment 
-category: misc 
-permalink: /FAQ-WYGexpts 
-redirect_from: /FAQ-wygexpts 
-date: 2018-05-24 
---- 
- 
-# The TeX document preparation environment 
- 
-''[Why TeX is not WYSIWYG](/FAQ-notWYSIWYG)'' 
-outlines the reasons (or excuses) for the huge disparity of user 
-interface between ''typical'' TeX environments and commercial word 
-processors. 
- 
-Nowadays, at last, there is a range of tools available that try either 
-to bridge or to close the gap.  One range modestly focuses on 
-providing the user with a legible source document. The low end of the 
-prettifying range is occupied by syntax highlighting: marking TeX 
-tokens, comments and other stuff with special colors. 
-Many free editors can cater for TeX in this way. At the other 
-extreme we have [TeXmacs](http://www.texmacs.org), 
-a document processor using 
-TeX's algorithms and fonts for both editor display and printing. 
-TeXmacs does not use the TeX 
-language itself (though among other formats, LaTeX may be exported 
-and imported).  A bit closer to LaTeX is 
-[LyX](http://www.lyx.org/), which has its own 
-editor display and file formats as well, but does its print output by 
-exporting to LaTeX.  The editor display merely resembles the 
-printed output, but you have the possibility of entering arbitrary 
-LaTeX code.  If you use constructs that LyX does not 
-understand, it will just display them as source text marked red, but 
-will properly export them. 
- 
-Since a lot of work is needed to create an editor from scratch that actually is 
-good at editing (as well as catering for TeX), it is perhaps no accident that 
-several approaches have been implemented using the extensible Emacs editor. 
-There are though a very large number of (La)TeX-specific editors: see 
-<https://tex.stackexchange.com/q/339/> for a (non-comprehensive) list. 
- 
-A different type of tool focuses on making update and access to previews of the 
-typeset document more immediate. This is typically handled using a system 
-called SyncTeX, which allows the relationship between lines in input and 
-position in PDF output to be tracked. Thus it is possible to switch directly 
-from a (potentially long) source to the resulting output, or _vice versa_. A 
-very large number of the editors mentioned above support this technology. 
- 
-The different approaches offer various choices differing in the 
-immediacy of their response, the screen area they work on (source or 
-separate window), degree of correspondence of the display to the final 
-output, and the balance they strike between visual aid and visual 
-distraction. 
- 
  
3_composition/pourquoi_n_est_ce_pas_wysiwyg4.1527509325.txt.gz · Dernière modification : 2018/05/28 12:08 de d.p.carlisle
CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International
Driven by DokuWiki Recent changes RSS feed Valid CSS Valid XHTML 1.0